16. Non-parametric Tests
16.7 Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
This is a rank alternative to the Pearson correlation coefficient that may be used when the assumption of normality is not met for hypothesis testing. It is defined by
where
where =
rank of point
and
=
rank of point
.
To test versus
use
itself as the test statistic and
from the Rank Correlation Coefficient Critical Values Table as the critical statistic. (Note that the Rank Correlation Coefficient Critical Values Table requires
.) Reject
if
.
Example 16.9 : Determine if the Spearman correlation between two textbook ratings, data given below, is significant.
Book | rating 1 (![]() |
rating 2 (![]() |
rank ![]() |
rank ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
B | 10 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
C | 18 | 20 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 1 |
D | 20 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
E | 12 | 16 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 1 |
F | 2 | 8 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 9 |
G | 5 | 11 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
H | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
![]() |
![]() |
Note the preliminary data reduction (ranking and rank differences, ) done to the right side of the table.
1. Hypothesis.
(Note that population values are inferred in the hypotheses statement.)
2. Critical statistic.
From the Rank Correlation Coefficient Critical Values Table with and
find
3. Test statistic.
4. Decide.
so do not reject .
5. Interpretation.
There is no significant correlation between the ratings.
▢